Search

Improving Patient care must be part of every Electronic Health Record (EHR) System

Except, only a Few EHRs were designed to enhance Patient care — or flat fulfill the needs of Medical Doctors

Originally published by Technology Hits on Medium


Photo by Scott Graham on Unsplash

Electronic health record usability points to the later technology’s standing to drive medical practices efficiently and conveniently. It is merely applied to the technology that offers user experiences that align with that particular industry’s professional needs.

Most current Electronic health records (EHR) lack usability for clinicians. That is because the mainstream EHRs being utilized today were created to enable medical billers and coders to obtain the information they needed to perform their jobs. That means, today, EHRs usability only helps the billing industry and data mining commerce.

Healthcare is an information-rich realm, serving as a sweet spot for the data industry to cash on. To reinforce patient care, the healthcare community must be able to wield tools that enable clinicians to concentrate on attending to patients. However, instead of devoting themselves to delivering high-quality patient care, clinicians have been eavesdropping on tiresome data entry chores that satisfy finance divisions’ needs.

Adding technologies to support billing is necessary but should be marginal to the clinician’s practice-focused contrivance. Enhancing the comfort of details from clinical documentation can minimize burnout and improve patient safety and relish.

Patient-centered medical care can tremendously benefit from health informatics. On the same scale, advances in technology have the potential to trivialize patient care. Thus, implementing proper information technology and EHR can provide a mechanism for patients to provide their clinicians with griping information.

Proper capture of clinical information enables patients to exert greater control over their own care. Clinicians can exploit EHRs to coordinate care and share information with other medical professionals. Patients and clinicians may use communication tools and information resources to interact with one another in new ways. Wariness in using new EHRs is justified to circumvent reliance on the biased or inappropriate systems as a whole, more so the data. So, clinicians may need to direct patients to appropriate information hoards. Nonetheless, both patients’ and providers’ most excellent dare identify high-quality information and do not hamstring their interplay. Concomitantly streamlining the workflows makes it easier for clinicians to quickly find the patient- and problem-specific information they need to drive better denouement.

In a survey conducted about EHR by the American College of Physicians, 34% of dissatisfaction was recorded among clinicians concerning EHR’s ability to decrease workload. Among the surveyed, 32 % had not returned to their everyday productivity two years after implementing an EHR system, and 37% were dissatisfied with the ease of use. In a different study, virtually 50% of providers thought that the cost of their strategy was too high. About 65% of respondents reported financial losses due to the implementation of their EHR system.

Physicians, to deliver top-notch patient care while being able to avoid burnout, switch EHRs. That is mainly because of inept workflows, meager interoperability, and usability. But switching to another EHR system, according to them, is a costly venture. However, given the lack of value provided by their previous EHR systems, many medical practices have selected to push on with swapping vendors, notwithstanding the possibility of not receiving an immediate return on the investment.

Each health system will need to thoroughly evaluate its current state and desired end state to determine if switching vendors is advantageous.

To empower clinicians with the correct information, EHRs need technologies that can review everything in the chart, intelligently filter the information in real-time, identify all the potentially relevant data points, and deliver pertinent details in a single view.

A new type of Electronic Health Record must be Personalized

Filtering through vast amounts of knowledge and finding the twist that applies to a particular patient’s circumstance is something with which computers ought to be helping physicians. Physicians still have problems creating and utilizing meaningful data that address the proper treatment and prevention options and prevention for each patient.

During the Obama oversight, the federal government replenished billions of dollars to stimulate the adoption of EHRs. But despite almost 96% of hospitals and 86% of physician offices acquiring them, the medical community still doesn’t have EHRs that can expand to the information challenges that clinicians face every day.

The modern EHR should include an archive of care plans reinforced by personalized key performance indicators (KPI) that cover a wide range of circumstances. Variations in patient individual factors and preferences would dictate variations in the plans. The contemporary electronic health record must incorporate algorithms to shape each patient’s particular main plan. Every team member, including the patient’s physician, experts, nurse, pharmacists, case managers, and the patient, would grasp both the principal plan and their peculiar to-do list within each scheme.

Stakeholders in the EHR should be able to assign tasks to one another. A qualified EHR must offer the ability to traverse care settings, geographies, and different EHRs. It should satisfy the requirements to travel seamlessly with the patient.

Analytics for both individual patients and populations must parallel each other. The system must evaluate how well the strategy realizes its goals, both for the individual patient and the larger population. Every Electronic Health Record should spread on lessons learned in treating one patient to other patients.

All in all, Electronic Health Records of the future should serve as the optimal logistics for a free, seamless administrative and clinical workflow process. When we make it easier for clinicians to access critical patient information, they will be less demoralized and burned out, and as a result, patient safety will have the ultimate helping hand.

“The existing validation of most common Electronic Health Records (EHR) is essentially performed through the business and billing branch of the medical practice, hence lacking thorough undertaking tenacity of the actual patient care and clinical decision-making Tasks”

#EHR #EMR #Healthcaretechnology #Medicalpractice

2 views0 comments