The sway of Individuality for the benefit of Mainstream and sake of rebellious Minority

Photo by Jezael Melgoza on Unsplash

A concerned glimpse into Physician and Patient Agency

In a given society, the capacity of individuals to act independently is influenced by a multitude of factors, such as social class, religion, gender, ethnicity, ability, and customs of that society. A person’s freedom merely depends on the constraints of the social structures. Frequently such an arrangement, whether intentional or a consequence of the constitutional interaction, becomes even more complicated.

The complexity by itself is a subject; frequently overlooked through widespread standards. It signifies that the common typically perceive complexity and chaos as the upshot of something or action. In fact, it is often the strategy to form an opportunity for a tiny minority against the mainstream majority. Since almost every modern society experiences the latter phenomenon in one way or another, still to the same scale, individuality and personal liberty are always subject to exploitation. To understand what I mean, we must first understand the definition of value. While at it- we must also sight the individual value within the context of the given social scenery.

The concept of Values

The values acquaint our thoughts, words, and actions. They are essential- because they help us prevail in life. Our values make the prospect we crave to endure.

Our values and beliefs reflect on the decisions we make day in and day out. Those decisions are always directed towards a specific end. All in all, the purpose of values is the well-being of individual lives or sometimes collective indigencies.

In the process of applying values towards determinations, we invariably execute purposeful choices towards what is relevant. And Meanwhile, when values partook, they build intimate coherence within a group.

Types of Values

Four types of values are described in an organizational setting: individual values, relationship values, organizational values, and societal values.


Individual values follow how one exhibits self in life, the specific needs-the principles they live by, and what we consider essential for our self-interest, such as enthusiasm, creativity, humility, and personal fulfillment.


Organizational values govern how our organization shows up and operates in the world. A few examples of organizational values include economic growth, collaboration, productivity, and strategic alliances.


Relationship values follow how a person relates to others—relationship statures such as friendship, family tree, or co-working within an organization shape Relationship values. The latter include transparency, trust, philanthropy, and caring.


Societal values ponder the way one organization reports to the community. Societal values include future generations, environmental mindfulness, science, and sustainability.

Definition of Value from a Socialist point of view

Socialists envision the necessary quality of people cooperatively. In socialism, values reflect mutual aid in striving toward a joint objective, as every part has precisely established errands. According to socialist values, constituents are valued only for their usefulness to everyone else. Thus, one in society bears a portion of the production based on how much every individual has offered.

Definition of Value from a Capitalist point of view

The capitalist culture assembles public exercises, norms, values, and habits primarily associated with the capitalist economic classification. Hence, the values in capitalism stand the reflections comprised of people bearing in harmony with a set of scholarly rules acting as they must execute to withstand in societies.

Elements of capitalist society encompass the mindset of business and corporate culture, consumerism, and working-class society.

Definition of Value from Individuality and the grassroots perspective

Individual value is an essential element of any grassroots value. It incorporates the most fundamental phase of any action or institution. Thus, for a grassroots society to entertain individual values ideally, it must incorporate Laissez-faire free-market economy.

The Laissze-Faire sees value as the reflection of its quality, uniquely based on the individual’s encounter with another within the liberated mass. The released value holds irrespective of the factors reflected through the collective societal reputation.

Agency and Nonagency

As described earlier within this writing, values catalyze one’s ability and willingness to act on their will, Hence called “Agency.”

One’s agency merely implies the individual’s independent capability to behave and practice their own unfettered opportunities. Nonetheless, absolute values are the upshot of social class, religion, gender, ethnicity, ability, customs, etc. In contrast, influence determines and defines an agency and the decision based on that completed. Henceforth, The latter is commonly referred to as “nonagency.”

In a one hundred percent Laissez-faire free-market economy, Nonagency anchors the point of the human dependence on market exchange for any goods or services. The need and loss of control over crop or skill to deliver will render that soul; Nonagent. The latter bear a resemblance to a battle between individual autonomy and the values that establish an agency.

In other words, nonagency defines the social association that describes the capitalist tone of production.

In free-market capitalism, the open, transparent, and fairness of system ensures optimal harmony. However, the latter still often fail because personages participating in the crony capitalist state of associations who exert a measure of influence over their immediate surroundings often use their impact to try and tune their independence with their nonagency.